Subaltern femininity in documentary cinema:

Making films from affectivity and equity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53897/RevGenEr.2024.03.07

Keywords:

feminist documentary cinema, subalternity, feminism, cinema with social impact, affectivity

Abstract

This article tackles on the following ques-tion: Does documentary cinema have a positive impact on the lives of women in subaltern conditions? Through history, this film genre has been characterized by relationships of power and domination between filmmakers and characters in front of camera. This has been especia-lly evident when talking about women who belong to minority groups such as LGBTTTIQ+, indigenous or Afro-descendant communities, women who are under economic precariousness or women who, due to different situations, live in contexts of vulnerability and marginali-zation. Accordingly, it is argued that the relationships of equity, empathy and affec-tivity from the production and creation of non-fiction cinema are fundamental elements so that these works can become tools that trigger transformations in the lives of femininities under condition of subalternity, generating benefits for them both at the individual level and at the social level. Therefore, the categories of Cine Transculturado and Cine Subalterno, proposed by Pritsch (2017), are taken up as a starting point from which agents in front and behind cameras can develop relationships of affectivity and equity. This essay takes Latin-American documentary films as examples, studying the affective relationships that were generated between filmmakers and characters during the pro-duction process, the positive impact of the films on the communities and the people portrayed in them, and the fundamental relationship between those elements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Juan Carlos Bermudez Rodriguez, Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, Morelos, Mexico

Mexican. D. in art history from the Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Humanidades del Estado de Morelos (CIDHEM) - Today El Colegio de Morelos. Full-time research professor at the Faculty of Design of the Autonomous University of the State of Morelos (UAEM). Lines of research: image and cultural studies within the framework of complexity; expanded image, image convergence, knowledge communication. Member of the basic academic core in the doctorate and master's degree in image, art, culture and society (IMACS - UAEM).

E-mail: juan.bermudez@uaem.mx

Sara Manuela Duque Garcia, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico

Colombian. Master in image, art, culture and society; PNPC-CONACYT postgraduate degree from the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos (UAEM). Professor at the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP), at the Centro de Formación Profesional ASMEDIA and at the Universidad Siglo XXI. Research interests: the representation of femininity in Latin American documentary cinema, women as filmmakers in Latin American documentary cinema.

E-mail: sara.duque@correo.buap.mx

References

Ávila-Fuenmayor, F. (2006). El concepto de poder en Michel Foucault. En: Telos, 8(2): 215-234.

Bourdieu, P. (2015). El sentido social del gusto. Siglo XXI Editores. Butler, J. (2007). El género en disputa. Planeta.

De Sousa, B. (2010). Descolonizar el saber, reinventar el poder. Trilce.

Herrera, S. (2015). Cine y violencia simbólica: La representación audiovisual del femi-nicidio en Ciudad Juárez en el género documental. En A.M. Sedeño Valdellós, P. Matute Villaseñor y María Jesús Ruiz Muñoz (coords.), Panorama del cine

iberoamericano en un contexto global: historias comunes, propuestas, futuro (pp. 141-162). Dykinson.

Lagarde, M. (2005). Los cautiverios de las mujeres: madresposas, monjas, putas, presas y lo-cas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

León, C. (2015). Regímenes de poder y tecnologías de la imagen. Foucault y los estu-dios visuales. En AKADEMOS, 1(1): 32-57.

Mulvey, L. (2009). Visual and Other Pleasures. Palgrave Macmillan.

Piedra, N. (2004). Relaciones de poder: Leyendo a Foucault desde la perspectiva de gé-nero. En Ciencias Sociales (Cr), IV(106): 123-141.

Santamaría, B. (2021). Cosas que no hacemos | Conferencia de prensa. [Archivo de video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORKGrUh-0_I

Pritsch, F. (2017). Cine documental y subalternidad. Niveles de enunciación y modos documentales. En Cine Documental, 16: pp. 96-112.

Segato. R. (2003). Las estructuras elementales de la violencia. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.

Spivak, G. (2010). Crítica de la razón poscolonial. Hacia una historia del presente eva-nescente. Akal.

Villareal, A. (2001). Relaciones de poder en la sociedad patriarcal. Actualidades Inves-tigativas en Educación, 1(1): 1-17.

Paranaguá, P. (2003). El cine documental en América Latina. Cátedra.

Niney, F. (2015). El documental y sus falsas apariencias. UNAM.

Breschand, J. (2004). El documental: La otra cara del cine. Paidós Ibérica.

Nichols, B. (2013). Introducción al documental. UNAM.

Zevallos, M. (2021). Prólogo. En: J. Haidar (Ed.). Tejedores de sabiduría insurgente (pp. 28-41). ENAH, Analéctica.

Filmografía

Kaplan. L. (Directora). (2020). La vocera. México: Alebrije Cine y Video, Olas Altas Productora, Monstro Films.

López, S. (Directora). (2021) El compromiso de las sombras. México: Documental Am-bulante AC.

Marán, L. (Directora). (2019). Tío Yim. México: Brujazul, Animal de luz, OA Soni-do, Phonocular.

Rodríguez, C. (Director). (2006) Las estrellas de la línea. Guatemala, España: Produc-ciones Sin Un Duro, Vértice 360.

Santamaría, B. (Director). (2021). Cosas que no hacemos. México: Foprocine, Ojo de Vaca.

Sojob, M. (Directora). (2019). Tote_Abuelo. México: Terra Nostra Films, Foprocine.

Published

2024-03-04

How to Cite

Bermudez Rodriguez, J. C., & Duque Garcia, S. M. (2024). Subaltern femininity in documentary cinema:: Making films from affectivity and equity. Géneroos, 2(3), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.53897/RevGenEr.2024.03.07

Issue

Section

Dossier