Alternate Societies and Spaces for Dialogue

Authors

  • Luis Rodríguez Castillo National Autonomous University of Mexico, Center for Multidisciplinary Research on Chiapas and the Southern Border. Mexico City, Mexico https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4887-823X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53897/RevESCC.2025.3.11

Keywords:

dialogue, culture, recognition, interculturality, alternative

Abstract

The book Alternate Societies and Spaces for Dialogue is presented as an exercise in “searches for the alternative, the new, the original in communicative frameworks” (Ochoa, Fabre and Gómez, 2020, p. 2) and is structured in four sections that bring together eighteen chapters, which are accompanied by an introduction titled “The intertext and its articulations” by the coordinators; and an introduction titled “The intertext and its articulations” by the coordinators (Ochoa, Fabre and Gómez, 2020, p. 2). its articulations” by the coordinators; which fulfills the basic function of presenting the the themes addressed in the collected texts. of the texts gathered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Luis Rodríguez Castillo, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Center for Multidisciplinary Research on Chiapas and the Southern Border. Mexico City, Mexico

Mexican. D. in Social Sciences from El Colegio Mexiquense A. C.. C., his lines of research are: anthropological theory, political anthropology, public policy analysis, local management and daily state formation process; from a methodological approach committed to an ethnographic perspective, biographical narratives and daily life. E-mail: lurodri@unam.mx

References

Huntington, S. P. (1997). El choque de civilizaciones y la reconfiguración del orden mundial, Barcelona, Paidós.

Huntington, S. P. (2004). ¿Quiénes somos? Desafíos de la identidad nacional estadounidense, Barcelona, Paidós.

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Rodríguez Castillo, L. (2025). Alternate Societies and Spaces for Dialogue. Estudios Sobre Las Culturas contemporáneas., 2(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.53897/RevESCC.2025.3.11