Modelos, métodos y técnicas de estimación de tablas de insumo producto regional: una revisión
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
El objetivo del presente documento busca discutir sobre la utilización de diversos
enfoques de regionalización para elaborar tablas insumo producto (IP) a
nivel subnacional. La evolución de estos enfoques considera tres elementos
a saber: el modelo, el método y la técnica. Mientras el primero se define por
la estructura teórica y analítica a emplear, el segundo lo hace a partir del tipo
de información a utilizar, a la vez que el tercero se ocupa de los procedimientos
de estimación. La revisión muestra que la estructura de los modelos es
diversa, que los métodos son predominante indirectos e híbridos y que las
técnicas principales son los coeficientes de localización, ajustes de balanzas
comerciales y el RAS. El debate actual muestra que la adopción de un determinado
enfoque generalmente gira en torno a los mejores ajustes y exactitud
que una estimación ofrece respecto de una tabla tomada como “verdadera”.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
COMMERCIUM PLUS permite compartir, copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato; adaptar, remezclar, transformar y construir sobre el material, dando crédito a la obra de manera adecuada y proporcionando un enlace a la licencia, indicando si se han realizado cambios.
References
Albornoz, Lilian, Rodolfo Canto y Javier Becerril (2012). La estructura de las interrelaciones de la economía de Yucatán: un enfoque de insumo producto. Región y Sociedad, 24 (54): 136-174.
Asuad, Norman y Jose Sánchez (2016). A methodological proposal for the construction of a regional input-output matrix using a bottom-up approach and its statistical assessment. Investigación Económica, 75 (298): 3-56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inveco.2016.11.001.
Bongfilio, Andrea (2005). Can non-survey methods subtitute for survey based methods? a performance analysis of inderect techniques of estimating I-O coefficients and multipliers. Ancona: Università Politecnica delle Marche.
Bongfilio, Andrea y Francesco Chelli (2008). Assesing the behaivor of non-survey methods for constructing regional input-output tables trough a monte carlo simulation. Economic Systems Research, 20(3): 243-258, https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310802344315.
Bon, Ranko (1984). Comparative stability analysis of multiregional input-output models: column, row, and Leontief-Strout gravity coefficients models. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99 (4): pp. 791-815.
Boomsma, Piet y Jan Oosterhaven (1992). A double-entry method for the constructions of biregional input-output tables. Journal of Regional Science, 32(3): 269-284, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1992.tb00186.x.
Callicó, Josefina (2003). La matriz interregional del centro occidente de México. En Insumo producto regional y otras aplicaciones, compilado por Callicó, Josefina, Rafael Bouchain, Abelardo Mariña et al. Distrito Federal: Ediciones y Gráficos Eón, 1-453.
Chapa, Joana, Edgardo Ayala e Izabel Hernández (2009). Modelo insumo producto para el noreste de México. Ciencia UANL, 12(4): 409-416.
Chenery, Hollis (1953). Regional analysis. In The structure and growth of the italian economy edited by Chenery, Hollis, Paul Clark and Cao-Pinna Vera. Rome: United States Mutual Security Agency, 1-165.
Czamanski, Stanislaw y Emil Malizia (1969). Applicability and limitations in the use of national inputoutput tables for regional studies. Papers in Regional Science, 23(1): 65-78, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01941873.
Dávila, Alejandro (2002). Matriz insumo producto de la economía de Coahuila e identificación de
sus flujos sectoriales más importantes. Economía Mexicana: NUEVA EPOCA, 11 (1): 79-162.
Dávila, Alejandro (2015). Modelos interregionales de insumo producto de la economía mexicana. Ciudad de México: M.A. Porrúa.
Fleeg, Anthony, C.D. Webber and M. Elliot (1995). On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input-output tables. Regional Studies, 29 (6): 195-805, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343409512331349173.
Fleeg, Anthony y C.D. Webber (1997). On the appropiate use of location quotients in generating inputoutput tables: a reply. Regional Studies, 31 (8): 547-561, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713693401.
Fleeg, Anthony y C. D. Webber (2000). Regional size, regional specialization and FLQ formula. Regional Studies, 34 (6): 563-569, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400050085675.
Fleeg, Anthony and Timo Tohmo (2012). A comment on Tobias Kronenberg: Construction of regional input-output tables using non-survey methods: the role of cross-hauling. International Regional Science Review, 36(2): 235-257, https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017612446371.
Fleeg, Anthony and Timo Tohmo (2016). Estimating regional input coefficients and multipliers: the use of the FLQ is not a gamble. Regional Studies, 50(2): 310-325, https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.901499.
Fuentes, Noé (2005). Construcción de una matriz insumo producto regional. Problemas del Desarrollo, 36 (140): 89-112.
Fuentes, Noé (2002). Matrices de insumo producto de los estados fronterizos del norte de México. Distrito Federal: Plaza y Valdés.
Fuentes, Noé y Alejandro Brugués (2001). Modelos de insumo producto regionales y procedimientos de regionalización. Comercio Exterior, 51 (3): 181-188.
Fuentes, Noé, Alejandro Brugués y Gabriel González (2015). Modelo insumo producto regional dinámico. Revista de Economía, 32 (84): 79-107.
Hewings, Geoffrey (1971). Regional input-output models in the U.K.: Some problems and prospect for the use of non-survey techniques. Regional Studies, 5 (1): 11-22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09595237100185021.
Hildebrand, George y Arthur Mace (1950). The employment multiplier in an expanding industrial market: Los Angeles County, 1940-1947. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 32(3): 241-249. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937531.
Isard, Walter (1951). Interregional and regional input-output analysis: a model of space economy. Review of Economic and Statistics, 33 (4): 318-328, https://doi.org/10.2307/1926459.
Isard, Walter (1953). Regional commodity balance and interregional commodity flow. The American Economic Review, 43(2): 167-180.
Isard, Walter and Guy Freutel (1951). Regional and national product projection and their interrelations. In Long range economic projection edited by Conference on Research in Income and Wealth. New York: NBER, 425-471.
Isard, Walter and Robert Keunne (1953). The impact of steel upon the greater New York-Philadelphia industrial region. Review of Economics and Statistics, 35(4): 289-301.
Jensen, Rodney (1980). The concept of accuracy in input-output tables. International Regional Science Review, 5(2): 139-164, https://doi.org/10.1177/016001768000500203.
Jensen, Rodney (1990). Construction and use of input-output models progress and prospects. International Regional Science Review, 13 (1): 9-25.
Kronenberg, Tobias (2009). Construction of regional input-output tables using non-survey methods: the role of cross-hauling. International Regional Science Review, 32(1): 40-64, https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017608322555.
Lahr, Michael (1993). A Review of the literature supporting the hybrid approach to constructing
regional input-output models. Economic System Research, 5(3): 277-293, https://doi.org/10.1080/09535319300000023.
Leontief, Wassily (1936). Quantitative input and output relation in the Economic System of the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 18 (3): 105-125, https://doi.org/10.2307/1927837.
Leontief, Wassily (1953). Interregional theory. In Studies in the structure of the american economy: theorical and emprirical explorations in input-output analysis edited by Harvard Economic Research Project. New York: Oxford University Press, 1-561.
Leontief, Wassily and Alan Strout (1963). Multirregional Input Output Analysis. In Structural interpendence
and economic development edited by Barna, Tibor. London: McMillan, p. 365. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81634-7_8.
Marto-Sargento, Ana (2009). Introducing input-output analysis at regional level: basic notions and specific issues. Discussion Papers REAL, 09 (T-4): 1-102.
McCann, Philip y John Dewhurst (1998). Regional size, industrial location and input-output expenditures coefficients. Regional Studies, 32 (5): 435-444, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343409850116835.
McMenamin, David y Joseph Haring (1974). An appraisal of non-survey technique for estimating regional input-output models. Journal of Regional Science, 14 (2): 191-205, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1974.tb00442.x.
Miller, Ronald (1957). The impact of aluminum industry on the Pacific Northwest: a regional input output analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (2): 200-209.
Miller, Ronald (1966). Interregional feedback effects in input output models. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 17 (1): 105-125, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01982512.
Miller, Ronald y Peter Blair (2009). Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, Frederick y James Petersen (1955). Regional analysis: an interindustry model of Utah. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 37 (4): 368-383, https://doi.org/10.2307/1925851.
Morrison, William y Peter Smith, P. (1974). Non-survey input-output techniques at small level area: an evaluation.
Journal of Regional Science, 14 (1): 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1974.tb00425.x.
Moses, Leon (1955). The stability of interregional trading patterns and input-output analysis. The American Economic Review, 45 (5): 803-832.
North, Douglas (1955). Location theory and regional economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 63 (3): 243-258, https://doi.org/10.1086/257668.